Jump to content
Click here if you are having website access problems ×

BDR /X Flow Spring Rates


Tazio

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know what the original spring rates BDRs and presumably  Xflows were fitted with?, both the 'standard', and the 'uprated' sets?

The reason I'm asking is Caterham don't know, and the data Chris has at Redline is info he gathered from Mick when he was at Redline, which is that the uprated fronts were 250lb, and uprated rears, 105 lbs, this instinctively seems a weird set up,  seeing as I use 250lbs fronts on my widetrack VX. 

Anyone have  the old info?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I got my car the back end was very spongy and grounded on the slightest bump.

I spoke to someone at Redline who told me the early de Dion cars had springs rated at around 80lbs (or something like that?) Which is indeed too soft.

From memory he said that the soft springs were blue, on checking mine under the grime and rust I found traces of blue paint! He suggested the correct springs for a standard car of that age should be 104lbs

I took his advice and bought the 104lbs springs with Spax adjustable shocks and the car is now fine.

Don't know who it was at Redline that I spoke to but he seemed to know his stuff, it was around 3 years ago.

My car is an 1987 Supersprint, I only use it on the road and have it set up for couping with pot holes rather than racing.

The part I ordered was: 79602   SPRING - REAR DEDION 09/88>07/91

Hope this is some help

Neil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neil,

Many thanks for responding.

They are the same rear springs that Chris at Redline has sent me too, and as you say 104/5 lbs, my concern centres around the fronts, part numbers 79601, these are rated at 250lbs, which seems instinctively too high for a narrow track, light engined 7 which is used solely on the road,  I maybe wrong of course lol. I don't know the origin of these spring rates, other than Chris obtained the details from Mick when Mick retired. For comparison for the early cars ie.post 1991, the front springs Caterham sell are rated at 170 lbs. So are the 250lbs the 'uprated' ones and the 170s, 'standard'?s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 1989  1600 sprint, narrow front, has an uprated suspension with no more trunions, Leda dampers and spring .

The Caterham  kit is 250 Spring front and 170 Spring for the rear . ( with Bilstein dampers )

The Leda system come with 300 lbs front and 170 lbs rear and I have that, working fine with a big front anti roll bar, if it can help .

 

 

 .

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have pretty much the same problem and am scratching everything trying to ensure I buy the correct springs. My chassis is a 1988  with everything bog-standard (eg. small anti-roll bar and cruciform top link)  
I need to replace the springs front and rear due to high mileage and wear but can't find the info on the rates anywhere (except maybe here!!) 
My car is a live axled (Ford) short cockpit and is a crossflow.

Any further info to the above would be greatly appreciated. Thank you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I have heard from Derek Howlett  (Caterham Tech)

"When we built these cars the standard spring rates were 105 Ibs front and 75 Ibs rear, we did do an upgrade which I have been informed was a better set up and that is 240 Ibs front 96 Ibs rear"

That makes sense to me as Mick at Redline sold me the (probably!) upgraded fronts in 1993 which would explain my running an 8 coil front spring!

It also makes sense that Redline are supplying 104 lbs rears which look pretty close.

Cheers,

David

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My is a 1988 live axle Marina these a my springs

Faulkner springs  front
1.9" diameter
8" length
225 lbs spring rate

Faulkner springs  rear
1.9" diameter
11" length
140 lbs spring rate (recommend dedion) maybe 170lbs spring are more for live axle

 

 

 

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

From Davids comment

 I have heard from Derek Howlett  (Caterham Tech)

"When we built these cars the standard spring rates were 105 Ibs front and 75 Ibs rear, we did do an upgrade which I have been informed was a better set up and that is 240 Ibs front 96 Ibs rear"

That makes sense to me as Mick at Redline sold me the (probably!) upgraded fronts in 1993 which would explain my running an 8 coil front spring!

It also makes sense that Redline are supplying 104 lbs rears which look pretty close.

Cheers,

David

Given there is significant rate increase, how have others found the ride?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK after much research and head scratching, I’ve decided to go for the Caterham developed live axle Bilstien and duel rate spring upgrade. I’m also considering the adjustable platforms. I can see there is a number of height rings for  what I think are Circlips. Are the adjustable platforms worth the expense for a road car?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's interesting that in the 1990 build manual the points to measure are under the front of the rear wing, but the measuring point at the front is just at the end of the cockpit floor section which from memory should be 140mm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, great insight thank you I recently found on EBay a hard copy of the Caterham assembly guide for the car. It makes no reference to rake in the mid 80’s. As I only plan to use the on road for touring the info is very helpful.

i have asked Caterham if these will suit even where the note says a replacement for the original SPAX’s , seems like a silly question but I need to make sure due, to of all thing the freight cost to Australia

https://caterhamparts.co.uk/live-axle/262-bilstein-springdamper-conversion-kit-live-axle-1999-onwards.html

from others suggestions I will also get a set of these. 

https://caterhamparts.co.uk/dampers/41-adjustable-platform-kit.html?search_query=DSSU01&results=2 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

120DA0C2-A43B-4C04-9E2D-4383C0082540.thumb.jpeg.418cc5a5dd34ba2f83a454072bf0c6fb.jpeg

I've now fitted the new springs and shocks and what a difference. Mainly on rough roads at 100ks big improvement.

Besides being Bilstien shocks the springs are made by Eibach ( as most are probably aware ) and Marked Caterham.

The fronts I roughly worked at are 140lb but the rears have two different rates due to way there wound and that did my head trying to work it out.

There is a course height adjustment via a circlip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...