Jump to content
Click here if you are having website access problems ×

Propshaft too short?


Doug Hall

Recommended Posts

I've been getting noise from the drivetrain on my Roadsport SV and took it in to have the gear box overhauled

The garage has pointed out that the propshaft looks too short as there should not be so much of the section that slides into the back of the gearbox exposed - see photo  Propshaft.thumb.jpg.b551576b0ea69e156026da7c674b7de2.jpg

I've been advised that the propshaft can be lengthened to address this.

Any advice you can give me in this would be welcome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jonathan

Mine is a 1990 kit and originally an X Flow. When I spoke to John and Mick at Redline about the problem a few years back, they told me that when CC ran out of stock of the correct shafts it was common practice to send out the slightly shorter Vauxhall units  *whistle*

Guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Area Representative

Going back to as far as 1994 there have been circumstances where the prop shaft supplied by CC have been of the incorrect length.

The prop shaft on my second Seven a 1.6K (2000 model home built) was too long as when I drove it for the first time it barely got around the block before 'stiffening up'. This also did not do the gearbox any good.

CC were aware of this problem but did not share it so they paid the price for rectification even before the car went for IVA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One can explain a method of work in a text it's always the reader who interpret what has been written. It's not the first time one explains something on the phone and then have the reply it doesn't work only if you show how it needs to be done they say ah right that is how it's done not to speak of eventually complications. To work on a caterham some tools are modified or only a specific socket makes the job easy like for the level plug on a Ford diff on a Dedion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

Thanks. I wouldn't disagree with any of that, but why wouldn't a multiauthor 7 Wiki be better than our current approach with information scattered across multiple threads and Guides? Especially as so many Members have problems searching.

Those special cases and exceptions could then be recorded and found every time whereas at the moment they're often omitted in any particular discussion.

And if the wiki wasn't clear then one of the many helpful experts could give the explanation and we could add it to the wiki.

Jonathan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

I've been caught out with advice meant for a different derivative - wiki just needs to define age, make, model etc. 

Definitely. And that's why we need to both consolidate the information and implement multi-authoring: that knowledge about different versions, requirements and special cases is scattered across multiple Members' minds.

Jonathan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

When we started work on the wikis last year it was agreed that the current Guides should be developed to implement them, rather than creating a new category. Shaun did the work that allows that. So the big difference is their support for multiple authorship. And that approach means that the change can be gradual.

Jonathan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...